The Inspection categories
RoadsideProof uses these shorter product labels for a subset of Inspection requests. They are not the official DataQs menu labels or every type available in DataQs.
- Inspection does not belong to this carrier
- Incorrect driver information
- Inspection is missing from the records
- Duplicate inspection
- Report data differs from the paper copy
- Violation recorded incorrectly, duplicated, or missing IEP/shipper information
- Citation tied to the violation — court outcome to be recorded
Match your situation to an official request type
Official names below follow FMCSA's RDR Request Type Definitions, March 2025, p. 2. Use the situation and evidence in the linked guide to choose; the product's paper-copy label maps to the general incorrect-information type.
- Inspection does not belong to this carrier
Inspection—Not mine (assigned to wrong motor carrier)
An inspection on the wrong carrier's record: what DataQs reviews- Incorrect driver information
Inspection—Not mine (assigned to wrong driver)
An inspection on the wrong driver: what DataQs reviews- Inspection is missing from the records
Inspection—Missing from carrier or driver report
How to file a DataQs Request for Data Review- Duplicate inspection
Inspection—Duplicate (same inspection listed multiple times)
The same inspection listed twice: what DataQs reviews- Report data differs from the paper copy
Inspection—Inspection report contains incorrect information/other
Wrong VIN, plate or other details on an inspection report: what DataQs reviews- Violation recorded incorrectly, duplicated, or missing IEP/shipper information
Inspection—Violation is incorrect, listed multiple times, or missing IEP/shipper information
A violation recorded incorrectly on an inspection: what DataQs reviews- Citation tied to the violation — court outcome to be recorded
Inspection—Citation with Associated Violation
A citation from an inspection: what the DataQs request needs, and what happens while the case is open
The official Inspection group also includes requesting a lost or never-received report. Other groups include Crash, DOT Audit/Investigation, Registration/Insurance, HHG Complaints, Clearinghouse and Other. This product list does not cover them.
What the court outcome does to the record
This table summarizes FMCSA's adjudicated-citation policy; it is not a verbatim official table or a reading of your case. It describes record treatment after agency review, not an automatic change or advice on court strategy.
The requestor submits verifiable certified court disposition documents, or a direct link to official court results, through DataQs. The State verifies the documents and records the outcome. The descriptions below are an editorial summary.
- Not guilty
Policy: remove from SMS and PSP
After verification, the policy excludes the associated violation from SMS and PSP; MCMIS retains the annotated record.
- Dismissed without fine or punitive court costs
Policy: remove from SMS and PSP
Payment alone does not determine the outcome. FMCSA excludes incidental expenses imposed regardless of outcome, such as scheduling fees, certified-copy charges, and attorney fees, from its conviction definition (79 FR 32495; Analyst Guide §5.4).
- Convicted of a different or lesser charge
SMS severity 1; no OOS addition
The inspection is annotated for conviction of a different charge in SMS and PSP. In SMS, severity becomes 1 with no additional OOS weight (79 FR 32495; SMS Methodology p. 3-15, note 19).
- Dismissed with fine or punitive court costs
Violation retained in SMS and PSP
The outcome is recorded as a conviction in MCMIS. Incidental expenses excluded by FMCSA are not punitive court costs.
- Diversion program costs or fees
Conviction treatment under the policy
The Analyst Guide treats costs or fees imposed for a diversion program as court costs qualifying as a conviction (§5.4, p. 40). A diversion or deferred-adjudication label alone does not establish a final disposition; a pending case and a documented final outcome must be distinguished.
- Convicted of the original charge
Violation retained in SMS and PSP
The violation remains in SMS and PSP under the adjudicated-citation policy. That conviction alone is not a basis for exclusion under this policy; a separate error in the inspection record requires its own supporting evidence (Analyst Guide §§5.6, 5.9).
- Pending or held in abeyance without fines or court costs
No final disposition yet
A case held in abeyance without payment of fines or court costs is not fully adjudicated. The analyst does not change the citation adjudication record until sufficient documentation confirms the final disposition (Analyst Guide §5.6, p. 42).
- Insufficient disposition documents
Outcome unknown
For an adjudicated-citation request, without sufficient verifiable disposition documents, the court outcome remains unknown. A missing document is not evidence of a conviction, dismissal, or not-guilty finding (Analyst Guide §§5.5–5.6).
These effects concern SMS and PSP. MCMIS retains the underlying violation record with its adjudication annotation; only violations determined to have been recorded in error are removed from MCMIS.
What the product checks
The product checks document completeness for its supported Inspection categories. Its upload requirements are separate from the evidence the agency needs to decide an RDR. A record-error request does not require a court disposition merely because it is an RDR.
How to read a citation is for the carrier or their attorney. The product applies the table as written and does not predict an agency decision.
Sources and factual review
Editorial source check: .
- FMCSA RDR Request Type Definitions · March 2025 · p. 2 Archived copy of the checked edition
- 79 FR 32491–32496 · June 5, 2014 · definitions and outcome table, pp. 32494–32495
- FMCSA DataQs Analyst Guide · 2nd edition, December 2014 · Chapters 4–6 (requests, adjudicated citations and record errors) · §§5.4–5.9 Archived copy of the checked edition
- FMCSA SMS Methodology v3.21 · methodology revised May 2026; document revised June 2026 · p. 1-2 note 6, pp. 2-3–2-9, Chapter 3 · p. 3-15, note 19 Archived copy of the checked edition
Document dates and data snapshot dates are separate from this editorial review. This review does not validate production calculations, document processing or storage controls.
More in Court outcomes